<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fellowship: Matthew 18:15-17</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the7ones.com/2009/03/28/fellowship-matthew-1815-17/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the7ones.com/2009/03/28/fellowship-matthew-1815-17/</link>
	<description>Digital Media Group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:30:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Clifton</title>
		<link>http://the7ones.com/2009/03/28/fellowship-matthew-1815-17/comment-page-1/#comment-1526</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Clifton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 00:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the7ones.com/?p=584#comment-1526</guid>
		<description>Dell,

Yes, to some extent the situation in 1 Corinthians 5 is a special case. The uniqueness of it is not in the result (withdrawal), however, but rather in the offense. Paul mentions this case specifically because of the severity of the sin, i.e. sin that not even the Gentiles would name. We have to remember that Paul had already warned them not to keep company with sexually immoral people who claimed to be Christians (1 Cor. 5:9), and in v. 11 Paul will add other offenses to the ones that warrant withdrawal. Anyway, we&#039;ll visit that in an blog entry very soon, Lord willing.

God bless you!

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dell,</p>
<p>Yes, to some extent the situation in 1 Corinthians 5 is a special case. The uniqueness of it is not in the result (withdrawal), however, but rather in the offense. Paul mentions this case specifically because of the severity of the sin, i.e. sin that not even the Gentiles would name. We have to remember that Paul had already warned them not to keep company with sexually immoral people who claimed to be Christians (1 Cor. 5:9), and in v. 11 Paul will add other offenses to the ones that warrant withdrawal. Anyway, we&#8217;ll visit that in an blog entry very soon, Lord willing.</p>
<p>God bless you!</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dell Kimberly</title>
		<link>http://the7ones.com/2009/03/28/fellowship-matthew-1815-17/comment-page-1/#comment-1522</link>
		<dc:creator>Dell Kimberly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the7ones.com/?p=584#comment-1522</guid>
		<description>Matt,
Is the situation in 1 Corithians 5 a special case?  Is this just an example of a &quot;run of the mill&quot; case?  Is there anything to be considered concerning the fact that this sin was even repulsive to those outside the church?  No hidden agenda, just an honest question.  dell</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,<br />
Is the situation in 1 Corithians 5 a special case?  Is this just an example of a &#8220;run of the mill&#8221; case?  Is there anything to be considered concerning the fact that this sin was even repulsive to those outside the church?  No hidden agenda, just an honest question.  dell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

