Should the Bible be interpreted literally?

April 14, 2007 Matthew Keedy Clifton Bible 'Quick Notes'

Generally, this is a question asked by folks who find something objectionable about the Bible! However, there are also honest souls who are truly seeking to know and do God’s will. For them, the question may remain. Should we interpret the Bible literally?

The general rule of biblical interpretation is that a passage should be interpreted literally unless there is some reason in the context we should interpret it otherwise. For example, when Jesus says, “Take My yolk upon you” (Matt. 11:29), He does not literally mean to place a wooden harness made for oxen upon our shoulders. The context provides the cues for properly understanding the passage.

Other passages are clearly meant to be taken literally. For instance, Jesus says in Mark 16:16:

He who believes and is baptized will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned.

There is nothing in the surrounding context of this passage to encourage a metaphorical interpretation. Instead, Jesus is plainly stating the terms of salvation. It is a direct command, no metaphorical figures being presented.

All written works contain some amount of information which is not to be taken literally. To say “none” of the Bible is to be taken literally is very inaccurate. To say that “all” of the Bible should be taken literally is also inaccurate. But the careful student will be able to discern between the literal and the non-literal passages in scriptures through diligent study.

For more reading on this topic, see Can We All Understand The Bible Alike?

Comments are currently closed.

One Response to “Should the Bible be interpreted literally?”


Powered by WordPress. Designed by elogi.

Bad Behavior has blocked 220 access attempts in the last 7 days.